{"id":8390,"date":"2011-12-28T06:34:05","date_gmt":"2011-12-28T12:34:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/?p=8390"},"modified":"2011-12-28T06:34:05","modified_gmt":"2011-12-28T12:34:05","slug":"reading-my-reader-a-systematic-approach","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/2011\/20111228-8390.htm","title":{"rendered":"Reading My Reader: A Systematic Approach"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If your reader is anything like mine, it simply explodes during periods of unavoidable delay (mainly while I&#8217;m at work). <\/p>\n<p>I leave with an easy couple hundred posts, but by the time I&#8217;m back my reader announces not a number but &#8220;1000+&#8221; behind &#8220;All Items&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>As such, I&#8217;ve taken to developing systems for dealing with reader overload.<\/p>\n<p>I say &#8220;systems&#8221;, for I have several. <\/p>\n<p><strong>System 1<\/strong> involves starting at the top and working my way down, reading every article in every folder. This is what I did at first&#8211;and what I quickly decided was unsustainable. I simply cannot read that much, and it leaves the poor &#8220;Younger Bloggers&#8221; in the last folder to sit in oblivion for what must seem to a youngster to be <i>forever<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Enter <strong>System 2<\/strong>. In this system, I randomly select folders and scroll through posts until I find one that looks interesting. I read that, mark it as read, and continue scrolling. The problem with this approach is that I keep finding articles that I want to read <i>eventually<\/i> but don&#8217;t feel that I have time to read <i>now<\/i>. These are generally those posts that exceed the golden word count of blogging (500 words). Then, I end up scrolling through those same posts interminably. Very frustrating.<\/p>\n<p>Which is why <strong>System 3<\/strong> is at an advantage. With system 3, I read everything that has been written in the past 24 hours and one further article before moving on to the next folder. This has the theoretical advantage of not allowing me to get further behind&#8211;but still risks missing the bottom folders due to time constraints.<\/p>\n<p><strong>System 4<\/strong> ensures that I get to all my folders. I simply read as many articles as are necessary to reduce my folder count to a multiple of five before moving along to the next folder. This means that folders with fewer posts (&#8220;People I know&#8221;, for example, or &#8220;2012-11-Comments&#8221;) get read all the way through, while folders with lots of posts (&#8220;News&#8221;) are barely skimmed. This is probably my favorite method except that it has gotten so boring to have all those fives and zeros on the ends of things.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s why <strong>System 5<\/strong> is currently my preferred route. In this system, I choose an arbitrary number (not 5) to be my divisor. So, if I have chosen &#8220;8&#8221; (as I did immediately before beginning this post), acceptable ending post counts could be 40, 160, 144, or 24; but not 38. The next time I read through (possibly in the same sitting, possibly on another occasion), I choose a new number. This system has the same disadvantage as System 4, but with the added advantage of regular recitation of my times tables (which are admittedly rather rusty.)<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the most effective system would probably be to subscribe to fewer feeds&#8211;but with so much to read each day, who has time to do that?<\/p>\n<p><i>So tell me (have you ever noticed how often I use &#8220;so tell me&#8221;?), do <b>you<\/b> have a system for reading your reader? Please tell me about it&#8211;I love adding new systems!<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If your reader is anything like mine, it simply explodes during periods of unavoidable delay (mainly while I&#8217;m at work). I leave with an easy couple hundred posts, but by the time I&#8217;m back my reader announces not a number but &#8220;1000+&#8221; behind &#8220;All Items&#8221;. As such, I&#8217;ve taken to developing systems for dealing with &#8230; <a title=\"Reading My Reader: A Systematic Approach\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/2011\/20111228-8390.htm\">Read more <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Reading My Reader: A Systematic Approach<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8390"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8390"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8390\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bekahcubed.menterz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}