There is no forbidden food

Since the original forbidden fruit, the history of humanity has been rife with food rules.

Don’t eat this, do eat that. That food is bad, that food is good.

Today’s modern dieter (and most women, regardless of their dieting status) have a deeply-seated conviction that some foods are bad (maybe even evil.)

Popular diet counsel might disagree over which foods are good and which foods are bad, but all of them agree that food is moral and some foods forbidden.

That is frankly unbiblical.

When God gave humanity food, He gave them all the plants and all the animals. In other words, He gave them everything for food.

Later down the road, after a group of Pharisees berate the Savior and His disciples for their eating habits, Jesus replies in a landmark exposition on food:

“Hear me, all of you, and understand: There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him, but the things that come out of a person are what defile him.” And when he had entered the house and left the people, his disciples asked him about the parable. And he said to them, “Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) And he said, “What comes out of a person is what defiles him.”
~Mark 7:14-20

In this passage, Jesus sets aright the wrong thinking of his day. Food cannot make one clean or unclean. Food is amoral.

Food enters through the mouth and is excreted at the bottom. It is external to the body, not internal to the soul.

Food doesn’t defile us, our hearts do.

In saying this, Jesus clarifies several hundred years of teachings and traditions regarding which foods one can eat and which foods one cannot.

As Mark, inspired by the Holy Spirit, wrote: “Thus he declared all foods clean.”

Perhaps we might still be able to excuse our attitudes and popular teachings about good foods and bad foods by saying that this is only one passage–and that the original context was about hand washing anyway.

But it’s harder to ignore the apostle Paul’s stunning of indictment of those who follow “deceitful spirits and the teachings of demons”:

“…who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, for it is made holy by the word of God and prayer.”
~I Timothy 4:3-6

Here, Paul not only says that forbidding food is unnecessary, he says that it’s demonic.

That’s right. It’s demonic.

The enemy would have us live in a world of forbidden foods. He would have us concerned about eating the right foods and avoiding the wrong ones. He would have us plagued with guilt over the food in our cupboards or what we order in a restaurant.

God, on the other hand, created all foods good. Nothing is to be rejected.

God (through the apostle) does not stipulate what we should eat, but how we should eat it.

There is no forbidden food. All food is to be received with thanksgiving.

I know that this is probably one of my most controversial teachings about food. I also know that many will ask about the Old Testament dietary laws–since Scripture certainly contains plenty of food restrictions. I plan to address those next week, explaining how the Old Testament dietary laws have been fulfilled in Christ–and are not binding on the New Testament believer (either as a command or as a suggestion of what to eat and what not to eat).

2 thoughts on “There is no forbidden food”

  1. I do believe that it has more to do with our heart than with our food intake. Still, I’m curious to hear what your take on Old Testament dietary laws are. (As I suspect that will touch on things like The Maker’s Diet which in some ways makes sense and in others does not.)

    I think if I could ever truly believe that all foods are lawful, but perhaps not beneficial, I would feel more freedom and peace. Because it is wrapping up one’s mind in the “do” and “do not’s” that tends to weigh a person’s mind down. (Pardon the pun there.) I think it is very important to choose wisely and well (as with everything) but that we should take care not to make such a religion out of our food that we serve it above all else and also limit our ability to fellowship with others due to our choices.

    Still thoroughly enjoying this series!

  2. I think those passages as well as the one in Acts 15 (where the church leaders are discussing what the newly-saved Gentiles should be observing about the law, and came up with four things. The couple of things that were related to food were a matter of testimony, I think. But the discussion there as to what they should observe gives good arguments as to why we’re not under the OT law) are very helpful.

    Just last week I was feeling very guilty over eating a piece of chocolate cake. Some part of my mind was saying, “But chocolate cake isn’t sinful.” I was even happy that I’d bought a single-sized serving instead of making a whole one. Finally the verse came to mind about all things not being expedient, and that helped (I imagine you’ll probably touch on that in the future.) It wasn’t sinful, but it wasn’t really wise since I’m needing to think about losing weight. That also helps in evaluating food for the future.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.