B3,RD: THE Nutrition Professionals

Three years ago, when I started my venture to read every book in Eiseley library, I used Pearl Buck’s rules to give myself an out. If, after reading 50 pages of a book, I was not interested in continuing on, I had permission to stop.

After three years and over 1400 books, I am using that rule for the very first time. Because I absolutely cannot stand Oz Garcia’s The Healthy High-Tech Body.

The Healthy High-Tech Body

Garcia’s biography in the back of the book states that he is “one of the best-known nutritionists and health authorities in America.” Problem is, he’s an absolute quack. Sure, he can throw around chemical names like no other and give incomprehensible explanations for why we should follow his recommendations–but the real science behind his recommendations is tenuous at best.

I know this because I’ve devoted the last six years of my life to learning the science of food, nutrition, and health behavior change. But what’s the average consumer to think? If you can’t trust “one of the best-known nutritionists and health authorities in America”, who can you trust?

That’s where the Registered Dietitian comes in. You see, anyone can call themselves a nutritionist–even someone with marginal education and no credentials (for instance, Oz Garcia.)

The designation Registered Dietitian (RD), on the other hand, carries distinct educational and professional requirements. RDs are required to complete a core curriculum in nutrition, food science, and health behavior change from an accredited university. RDs are required to undergo at least 900 hours of supervised practice. RDs are required to pass a Registration Exam and complete at least 75 hours of continuing professional education every five years in order to attain and maintain their credentials. Additionally, RDs are bound by a Professional Code, which, among other things, insists that they provide evidence-based nutrition services.

You wouldn’t go to your next door neighbor–or even Oprah–to get your broken arm set. Your next door neighbor is nice enough–and Oprah is popular enough–but neither have the credentials to set your broken arm. You’ll go to someone who does have the credentials: an MD (Medical Doctor), a PA (Physician Assistant), or a NP (Nurse Practitioner).

Likewise, no matter how nice or how popular a “nutritionist” might be–they don’t have the credentials unless they’ve got an RD behind their name.

So next time you’re looking at an article or a book, or evaluating something someone is saying on the television or online, look for the RD behind the name. Because RDs are THE food and nutrition professionals.

Today’s B3,RD challenge is to think critically about the nutrition information you see and hear today. Ask yourself whether the speaker has the credentials–an RD behind their name.

A search for Garcia’s education and credentials produced only the most tenuous results.

Mr. Garcia is occasionally ascribed a Ph.D, but I have been unable to find any explanation for this designation. He has certainly never listed where he attained his doctorate or what his doctorate is in.


Angry and Elusive

I looked up from the table I’d been wiping to see that four male coworkers, and the male half of the one remaining couple left in the dining room, were staring at the tv screen. When I glanced towards the screen, what I saw had me race-walking to a remote to turn off the tvs.

I don’t know what makes tv producers think they can show naked women on television at 7:30 in the evening (or at any time for that matter), but whatever it is, they’re just plain wrong. I don’t care if they’re making a “mock-u-mentary” on Playboy bunnies–showing naked women is still not appropriate. I object on so many different levels. 1) Nudity (especially of the type I saw) should be classified as obscenity. It is inappropriate and vulgar. 2) The type of nudity that I saw (and that my male coworkers were glued to) objectifies females, reducing them to sex objects. This objectification is bad for both men and women–who find it increasingly difficult to have healthy views of their and others’ bodies, healthy attitudes towards sex, and healthy sexual relationships, partly due to this objectification. 3)
I saw this nudity on tv during “prime time”. Sure it may be cable, but don’t be so naive as to think that children don’t have access to cable tv at 7:30 in the evening.

No one–not adults, not children, not males, not females–should ever have to see such a thing on television.

I was still steaming about the nude playmate I’d just seen when a coworker asked me “How old are you, Rebekah?” Now realize, I’m not a very secretive person. My life is pretty much an open book. But today, and with this guy, I just really didn’t want to say. So I answered with an elusive “I’m in my mid-twenties.” “That’s about what I would have guessed,” he returned. “I’m not exactly a spring chicken myself.”

Yep, I’m sure you’re not. Nice try buddy, but that’s a strike out. I prefer mature men–and those who look away rather than look twice when a naked woman appears on a tv screen.


Not all bad news

I told myself I wasn’t going to stress. Wasn’t going to watch the news. Wasn’t going to follow the play-by-play’s online.

So guess what I’ve been doing this evening?

If you guessed stressing and following the play-by-play’s online, you’d be right. Bonus points if you included an Excel spreadsheet with my own predictions for the winner.

I have to say I’m disappointed that the presidential race is leaning at Obama (I have little doubt that the networks have already proclaimed him the winner.) But, at least in Nebraska, there are small victories to celebrate.

Mike Johanns beat out Harvard boy Scott Kleeb in the Senate race–keeping one of Nebraska’s Senate seats in the Republican fold. (And Johanns is a much more conservative Republic than Hagel, who he’s replacing.) Jeff Fortenberry has been re-elected to the House of Representatives. I was also pleased to see Adrian Smith be re-elected. I enjoyed listening to him when he visited UNL’s college Republican’s a couple of years ago when he was running against the aforementioned Hahvahd child.

Even more exciting is the triumph of Tim Clare over Earl Scudder in the University of Nebraska’s Board of Regents race. Scudder made his support of embryonic stem cell research a main player in his advertising campaigns, euphemistically calling it “support for life-saving research.” Clare took a more ethical stance and proclaimed his support for the TRULY life-saving (and life-enhancing) adult stem cell research, but his opposition to the death-dealing embryonic stem call research. If you didn’t already know, adult stem cells are already being used for life-saving and life-enhancing therapies. Despite many years of research (and tons of research dollars spent), embryonic stem cells have failed to produce even one mildly successful therapy. YAY for CLARE! I’m glad you (and life) won.

Another big woohoo for Nebraska is the passing of an initiative to ammend the Nebraska constitution for the prohibition of Affirmative Action by any government entity. Equal Opportunity triumphs at last! Down with discrimination–up with getting the best guy (or gal) for the job!

But the biggest reason to not kill myself come January 19th (and perhaps even to celebrate despite the impending destruction of a nation I love) is what I read this morning in Revelation 19:6 “Alleluia! For the Lord God Omnipotent reigns!” And what I read this evening as I was copying Obadiah 21 “And the kingdom shall be the Lord’s.” I am temporarily a citizen of this earth, and a citizen of the United States of America. Despots rise and fall here, and every so often, a decent ruler comes into power. But I have a permanent citizenship in a kingdom whose ruler has never been voted out of office, never been overthrown by a coup’d’etat, never had a veto overruled by a two-thirds majority of senate and house. I have a king who has never cut military spending, who always keeps His men clad in the best of defensive armor and fighting with the most up-to-date offensive weapons. I have a king who has never taken from me what is rightfully mine to give it to another who does not deserve it–instead, He has taken what was rightfully His and given it to me (who cannot even begin to deserve it). The United States may be going to hell in a handbasket–but I’m not going with it, because I don’t belong here. “The Lord God Omnipotent reigns!”


Rage against the system

In case you didn’t know, becoming a health care provider isn’t cheap. The six to fifteen years of school and/or supervised practice isn’t cheap. The professional organization memberships aren’t cheap. The malpractice insurance isn’t cheap. The equipment isn’t cheap. Continuing education and the reading and travel that go along with it aren’t cheap. And that’s just talking direct economic costs.

I wish we could talk health care without having to talk about money. I wish we could all offer our services for free. Unfortunately, if all health care providers offered their services for free, we’d soon have no health care providers. It costs too much to become a health professional and to maintain professional standards as a health professional to not get paid. So somehow, we’ve got to get paid.

The majority of payments that come to health professionals come through insurance companies. They decide what they’re willing to pay for and how much they’re willing to pay for it–sort of. The sort of is because most insurance companies use Medicare and Medicaid as the basis for making their decisions regarding payment. If Medicare or Medicaid covers it, private insurance is sure to follow.

If Medicare/Medicaid covers Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) for a disease, then dietitians get paid. If the government isn’t willing to pay a dietitian for Medical Nutrition Therapy–neither will the private sector. So if dietitians want to get paid, they have to convince the government to foot the bill. It’s bad enough that money makes the world go ’round–even worse, too often it’s government money that makes the world go ’round.

I sat through Community Nutrition tonight biting my tongue and swinging my legs and wondering why it felt like I was being told to sell out. Contribute to the ADA-PAC. Sell your vote for support for nutrition-related legislation. Campaign for somebody on the basis of dietetics. Bribe your congressman. Join the lobby. Sell out.

I want dietitians to get paid for what they do. Why? Because they provide an invaluable service to health care. Dietitians have the knowledge and skills to prevent disease rather than just managing it. Medical Nutrition Therapy is incredibly cost effective from a medical standpoint. It prevents the occurence of disease in the well and prevents the development of complications in the diseased. Medical Nutrition Therapy means fewer drugs, fewer diseases, fewer costly medical interventions, and ultimately fewer deaths. That’s a lot of bang for a little buck.

The problem is that if dietitians are going to get paid for what they do, the government is going to have to pay it. Congress is going to have to approve MNT for Medicare/Medicaid patients if MNT providers are going to get paid by anyone for any of the work they do. Which puts me in a very difficult situation.

I’m a fiscal conservative. I’m a true believer in free market. I much prefer the invisible hand to the “Wonderful Wizard of Washington”. I don’t believe that throwing government money around solves anything. The Robin Hood complex is a mental illness, not benevolence. Stealing from the citizen to support the system isn’t my way of going about things.

So what am I to do about dietetics? I want to get paid. I want my profession to get paid for its legitimate work. I just don’t want the government to be doing the paying.

Our economic system depresses me. We’ve messed it up so much that it’ll take a MASSIVE restructuring to return us to free market principles. Unfortunately, when even the conservatives start throwing government money around in an attempt to “save” the economy, how can we hope to ever have a stable economy?

I almost think it’d be best to just never mind the short-term consequences. Knock off all government intervention in the economy and wait for things to equalize. Then, once we’re dealing with a free economy, we can rebuild the way the American economy was first built–on hard work, civic responsibility, and innovation.


If you have a problem with me, please talk to ME

Apparently my clothing is an issue for certain women in our congregation. Unfortunately, they don’t tell me themselves, so I can’t really correct the situation.

I thought it somewhat unusual, but didn’t think much on it when the first words out of her mouth when I opened the door were “Oh, you’re still wearing that dress.” The comment registered as odd–I almost never change out of my church clothes on Sunday–but since I sometimes don’t know what to make of her, I just smiled.

Then as I was hustling everyone out the door so I could get to my study session, I commented that I was a bit overdressed for a study group. Mom concurred and asked some of the other ladies if they’d wear my dress to a study group. When she got to the one woman, she said “Of course, you wouldn’t wear that dress for anything.”

The lightbulb clicked on. Apparently, she had a problem with my dress. And apparently she vented it to my mom (and probably my dad and all my siblings, as well as her own children) on the way home from church.

Unfortunately, the one person she failed to talk to about it was me. So I have no idea what she found objectionable about my outfit and whether her complaint was valid. Since she still has a hard time putting off her scarves, I don’t have any guarantee that she isn’t just reacting out of the Islamic culture she’s still coming out of. But I don’t know for sure because she didn’t talk to me about it.

Was it that the dress was sleeveless? Or maybe the back was too low for her taste. Maybe she didn’t like that it was knee length. Maybe she doesn’t like the fact that I have curves, and nothing short of wearing a bag (which she does but I’m certainly not inclined to) could conceal them. Maybe she doesn’t like the color red. Or maybe it was a really legitimate complaint. Maybe you could see straight through the skirt because I wasn’t wearing a slip with it. Maybe my bra straps were showing in the back and it looked awful. But I don’t know if it was any of those things–or something else entirely–because she didn’t talk to me about it.

I’ve had this happen before, where someone complained to my mom about my clothing. Mom mentioned it to me later. That “correction” was hard to submit to because I was so hurt that this woman, with whom I have a fairly good relationship, would go to my mom instead of me with a complaint about my clothing. At least I know that she spoke to Mom about it privately.

This time, I’m not sure what to do. Do I ask Mom to clarify? Do I ignore the criticism since she didn’t come to me about it? Do I ask my brothers about what they heard? Or maybe I should ask my Dad. Do I seek to deal with whatever she had a problem with in the name of “not putting a stumbling block in a sister’s way”? Or should I even bother trying not to offend someone who’s gossipping about my clothes to my family behind my back?

Please, if you ever have an issue with my clothes–or anything else concerning me–come to ME. I can’t promise that I’ll immediately agree with what you say, that my pride won’t rise up and make me try to defend myself. But I can promise you that I’ll consider your correction, and pray about it, and attempt to work on it. I did when a sister mentioned her concerns about my inattentiveness while driving. I did when a brother pointed out that I was filling my plate too full. I want to grow, I want to receive rebuke. Just please, talk to ME.


Going Green? All the Way, Baby. Voting Green? Okay, not that far.

I think I might qualify as an environmentalist. I am very concerned about my impact on the environment. I care about what kind of earth I leave to the generations behind me. I believe, as C.S. Lewis suggested, that expectation for a better world (heaven) should make me even more inclined to make a difference in this one.

To this end, I do my best to work towards eco-friendliness. I’ve made myself some shopping bags and take them with me faithfully. Paper or plastic? I go with cloth. I don’t even use their bags to put my produce or bulk items in–I bring in my own heavy duty bags (recycled from work.) I recycle everything I can–and if I can’t recycle it at the city recycling center, I find a way to reuse it at home (or to not buy it at all.) I use every bit of white space in my paper before sticking it in a bag to recycle it.

I make my own laundry soap and clean almost anything with vinegar. I’ve pretty much eliminated “paper products” from my life. I use cloth napkins, hankies, and pads. I hibernate or turn off my computer when I leave the room. I keep my shades down during the bright summer afternoons to keep from using extra energy to keep the house cool. I finally got a blanket for my hot water heater (woo-hoo!) My worms for vermiculture should arrive in the mail any day now.

I buy used instead of new, I give away instead of throwing away. I don’t buy if I don’t need. I grab the paper that would otherwise be thrown away at work to use as scratch paper. I think I probably qualify as a bona-fide green do-gooder. Or if not bona-fide, I’m at least a pretty good wanna-be.

But what I don’t do, and don’t think I’ll ever do, is vote on the basis of environmentalism. Because what I’ve seen of political environmentalism is basically the lefts version of “legislating morality”. They think that if they just make all sorts of laws protecting the environment and punishing or forbidding its desecration, that somehow that’ll make a difference. And maybe it will. But at what cost? At the cost of people’s liberties? At the cost of our economy? At the cost of an even more massive bureaucratic government?

I have the unfortunate luck to be someone who cares about what the left has co-opted as “liberal issues.” Environmentalism, women’s rights, public health, education–those are some of my concerns. I just don’t agree with the lefts way of going about those issues. Politically, I do more than lean to the right–I believe in limited goverment, fiscal conservativism, local control, strong foreign policy, and that America has both the privelege and responsibility to act as a force for freedom in the world.

So I find myself stuck in the middle of a sad little fight. The environmental blogs that I read and enjoy are up in arms about this coming election, and so am I–on the other side.

I enjoy the tips on green living–I enjoy sharing commonalities with people who also vermicompost and deal with people’s funny looks at their homemade shopping bags. I just don’t enjoy people bashing my candidate on one point (environmentalism) and then accusing conservatives of being “one issue voters.” I listed my political values a couple of paragraphs up–do those look like single issue topics?

–So at this point, I’m just ranting. Or maybe I have been all along. But come on, guys, give me a break–just because environmentalism isn’t my political litmus test doesn’t mean I’m a hard-nosed, knock-down-the-little-guys and pollute-the-water-system junky (or the Devil incarnate). I’m a citizen who cares about a deep variety of issues (that people across the political spectrum care about) and votes accordingly. So please, calm down and let me weigh EVERYTHING–instead of just your ONE hot-button issue.


I love my body…but I envy yours

I love my body–I’m probably the most body-confident person I know. I think I’m beautiful. I think my body is shapely. I look like I belong in a painting (of some goddess or other.) I really, really like my body. My body image is SUPER high. But that doesn’t stop me from envying smaller women.

When I do shop for clothing, I generally shop used stores. They’re economically sensible, environmentally sound, and you don’t have to end up dressed like everybody else. But invariably, I’ll find some gorgeous skirt or dress, and pull it out to discover that it’s a size 4. Most of the cute clothes at the used stores I frequent are in smaller sizes. My size clothes tend to have elastic segments on their waistbands and silly furbelows here and there.

Even if I weren’t shopping used stores, I’d still find shopping difficult. You see, my beautiful bod is somewhere between a size eight and a size fourteen. I can wear size 8 bottoms–as long as the designer was so good as to put a long enough zipper in it that the waist will fit over my hips and as long as the crotch is long enough that I can actually get the waist up to my natural waist and as long as the bottoms are long enough to fit my really long legs. Otherwise, I might wear up to a size fourteen–which will be held up by my hips, while the overlarge crotch bags between my legs and the enormous hip space sags on either side. Even a size fourteen may not be long enough–they’re generally longer because they sit lower on my waist, but even then I can’t wear heels with them. Because despite what magazine advertisements might lead you to believe, clothing is not made for tall, shapely women.

Shirts are even more difficult, because my bust is large while my waist is small–and because I’m tall. That means that if I buy a shirt that fits my bust, it makes me look like a frump because it’s made for a woman with belly fat (which I don’t have). If I buy a shirt that fits my waist, I look like a tart–because it’s not made for a person with a large bosom. Which brings up another issue. If I wear a high neckline, it’s like putting on a sign–“Look at my big breasts.” If I wear a lower neckline (scooped, vee, square, etc.), it’s like “Whoops, there’s cleavage.” The large bust and my tall frame also means that most shirts are WAY too short–showing off my belly button and that little waist. I solve both problems by wearing wife beaters under my clothes–they cover at the top and extend down past the bottom. But wife beaters aren’t exactly professional dress, if you know what I mean. Which leaves me in a bit of a predicament.

So, while I love my body, I often look enviously at the petite little things with only the slightest curves. I see them clicking down the street in a fitted pantsuit and heels and think “Wouldn’t I love to be you.” Imagine wearing a suit that fit my bust, my waist, and my hips simultaneously. Imagine wearing slacks that were long enough that I could wear heels with them without looking silly. Imagine having extra fabric to take in instead of having to leave behind the jacket because the arms were too short–and there wasn’t any extra fabric to lengthen them with.

I almost have the body of a model–tall, thin, large breasts. I say almost because my breasts are natural and my BMI is actually healthy (as opposed to the “standard” model’s 17 or so–which is underweight and associated with increased morbidity and mortality). But the world that sets up an unrealistic standard for most girls to aim for fails to accommodate for the standard. Where are the clothes for tall, thin, busty women? They don’t exist.

My body’s beautiful, but it just doesn’t fit into any of the preconceived notions of sizes. And sometimes, just sometimes, I wish it did. Imagine going into a store and buying something without trying it on. Imagine only trying on five items before finding one that fit.

I purchased eight articles of clothing at the used store today. I tried on over a hundred. I tried on twenty suit jackets and didn’t find one that had arms long enough for me. Almost 50 skirts and only four made the cut. I’m pleased with my purchases–four skirts, 3 dresses, and a suit set. I’m happy with the two belts, the purse, and the pair of shoes (wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles) that I bought to accompany them. I only paid $27 for the twelve items. But I spent almost three hours feverishly trying on clothing–completely breaking the rules by taking in 30 or 40 items each time I went into the dressing room. I dressed in seconds–and generally could spot the error within seconds as well. Bosom too tight. Skirt slips over hips. Skirt won’t slip over hips to get it on. Arms not long enough. Designed for a big bellied woman. I’ve developed the skill of maniac dressing–I can try on an item and determine that it won’t do within 30 seconds. But 3 hours of 30 second try-ons is a lot of time for eight items. Perhaps you see my predicament.

I’m cheating on my time-stamp and marking when I began rather than when I ended this post. It’s really Wednesday’s post, which I thought about throughout Wednesday afternoon and evening and began in the evening–even though it is currently 12:30 on Thursday morning.


Patriotic Peeves and Patriotic Prayers

I tend to have rather strong opinions about things–and patriotic music just happens to be something about which I have a very strong opinion. Patriotic music moves me to tears–and makes me seethe. I love most of it–and hate some of it.

My peeves about patriotic music? First, the tendency of people to classify certain songs that are not patriotic music as patriotic music. Julia Ward Howe’s Battle Hymn of the Republic is a prime example. It’s not patriotic, guys. It doesn’t mention America anywhere in it–it doesn’t have anything to do with a specific nation. It has to do with God’s righteousness and wrath. It’s about God accomplishing His purposes–and about men being obedient to the calling. Yes, it was a battle hymn of the civil war–but it isn’t a patriotic song.

Second, it annoys me that the patriotic songs most often heard are sappy and sentimental and NEW. It’s not that I’m against new songs in general–it’s just that so few of our contemporary songs actually have meaning. They’re so simplistic, so blah. They are meant to inspire tears but not to inspire thought.

Third, some patriotic songs annoy me by adding certain phrases in that just don’t fit. Take America, the Beautiful. It’s a gorgeous song, but what are you talking about “Thine alabaster cities gleam/undimmed by human tears”? I know, Katherine Lee Bates was referring to the White City of the Columbian Exposition World’s Fair in Chicago in 1892–but the “undimmed by human tears”? That’s Biblical imagery–and it refers to the New Jerusalem. America’s great and all, but it’s not heaven on earth. I’m still waiting for that new heaven and new earth–that and only that will be a city “undimmed by human tears”.

But don’t get me wrong–I love patriotic songs. Certain parts of the classic songs perfectly express my heart and my prayers.

Today, I think of our nation. I remember the revolutionary idea that sparked the American Revolution–and that still sparks revolutions around the world. The idea that men can be free. Liberty. It’s quite a heady idea. I think of it and I pray:

Our fathers’ God, to Thee,
Author of Liberty,
To Thee we sing:
Long may our land be bright
With freedom’s holy light;
Protect us by Thy might
Great God, our King

Today, I think of the many men (and women) who have given their lives, their blood, their anguish, years of their lives to make our nation what it is. I think of the wives and children at home–giving up husbands and fathers. I think of the thousands of heroes who have served throughout the years and continue to serve now in our military. I think of them and I pray:

O beautiful for heroes proved
In liberating strife
Who more than self
Their country loved
And mercy more than life
America, America
May God thy gold refine
Til all success be nobleness
And every gain divine

Finally, I think now of a nation at war–of our men and women currently fighting on the front lines. They fight for freedom, for liberty, that same thing I celebrate today. I think of the many of us enjoying our picnics and barbecues today, enjoying victory and peace. I think of how quickly we have forgotten who makes this nation great–how quickly we have turned to rely upon ourselves. And I pray for my countrymen and women, both those here and those abroad:

O thus be it ever
When free men shall stand
Between their loved homes
And the war’s desolation
Bless’d with vict’ry and peace
May the heav’n rescued land
Praise the Pow’r that hath made
And preserved us a nation
Then conquer we must
When our cause it is just
And this be our motto:
“In God is our Trust”
And the Star Spangled Banner
In triumph shall wave
O’er the land of the free
And the home of the brave


The Cost of Allergies

Someone once said that you can determine a person’s priorities by looking at their checkbook register. If you looked at mine (and if I were a little better a keeping my checkbook register up to date), you would discover that “managing allergies” is definitely on my priority list. I spend at least $75 a month on medications used to control allergies.

But the cost of allergies is really much greater than a simple glance at my checkbook might reveal. That sort of calculation doesn’t take into account the cost of air conditioning my home and car (even when the outside temperature may be comfortable). It doesn’t take into account the cost of washing my sheets in hot water (as opposed to cold water). It doesn’t take into account the extra loads of laundry required by more frequent washing of drapes and throws and pillows. It doesn’t take into account the cost of using a dryer for all my laundry (instead of hanging it on a line.) It doesn’t take into account the extra cost of purchasing more effective furnace filters–and purchasing them more often. It doesn’t take into account the extra cost of bleach and of vacuum cleaner bags for less allergenic cleaning.

And those are only the financial costs of allergies. Once you start thinking about quality of life, the equation builds. Allergies mean that I have to take medication three times a day–and at just the right times in order to avoid the worst symptoms. Allergies mean that I have to shower and wash my hair before bed every night so that I don’t “track allergens” into my bed and sleep with them all night. Allergies mean that I need to be hyper-vigilant about cleaning my house (When was the last time you dusted your mini-blinds?). Allergies mean I have to consider what sort of exposure I’ll have before venturing outside for a walk, a game, a dip in the pool.

Then there are the miscellaneous, little things that start to add up after a while. The allergic blepharitis that keeps me from wearing eye makeup. The bronchospasm that often limits me to walking for aerobic exercise (and rules out “spur of the moment” exercising). The crinkle of the allergen-proof mattress and pillow covers.

I know that there are plenty of diseases out there that cause lots of problems. Allergies are certainly one of the least–especially my type of allergies, which are by no means life-threatening. But even so, considering the cost of allergies (even just “environmental” allergies like my own), don’t you think it might be worthwhile to invest something into searching out a way to prevent or cure allergies?

This post was thought up and written on June 25–that’s why I dated it as June 25. However, I got sidetracked and didn’t actually “post” it to the internet until early on June 26. Sorry!


You are a conqueror!

Girls have a great longing to be wanted, to be desired, to be seen as valuable. Guys have great longings too. They want to be conquerors, to be protectors, to be providers. Both sets of longings affect their owners’ relationships with the opposite sex. When women are single for a prolonged amount of time (even if that’s only six weeks since they first got interested in guys!), they start wondering if maybe they’re unwanted, undesirable, worthless. Guys, when they’re single, start thinking that maybe they’re weak, powerless, ineffective, impotent.

We recognize this in women–and we have a hundred books and a hundred speakers to tell the women that it isn’t so. “You are valuable.” we tell our single women. “You are desirable not because some boy somewhere decided that he could get something from you, but because the King of the Universe wanted you so badly He gave everything for you.” Walk into any Christian bookstore and you can find plenty of resources for single women dealing with this topic.

The other side of the equation is a bit murkier. We don’t really say much to the single men. “Don’t lust.” “Don’t sleep around.” “Be a man–do what’s best for her.” Instead of encouraging the men, often we end up discouraging them. Our unspoken words sound more like, “You’re right, you aren’t really a man. You haven’t even got your own impulses figured out–how can you even think about marrying? You’re not a man–you don’t want to protect her.”

Maybe I’ve even been guilty. My younger brothers tease Anna and I about getting them some brothers-in-law and I say “That’s not my job.” I don’t clarify that it’s not necessarily the guy’s job either. So maybe the impression I’m leaving is that it’s the guys’ job to find themselves wives. If they can’t find themselves a wife–I guess they just aren’t doing their job.

Weak. Powerless. Ineffective. Impotent. Bad Provider. Bad Protector. Conquered. How often do we tell them that’s what they are? We rag on them for their lust–while we openly discuss “hot guys” and the relative merits of Colin Firth vs. Hugh Grant (okay it’s official: I’m getting old!). We play our little games of “You’ve got to protect me”–from the other Christian boys. We tease them with their powerlessness against PC culture–“Hitting you isn’t abuse. You’re a white male!” “Get yourself a date” we tell them, as if that’s all there is to it.

Why don’t we tell them what they really need to hear? Why don’t we say something constructive? Why don’t we tell them what God thinks of them?

Why is it that we’ve been so sensitive to the women’s feelings of being unloved, unwanted, undesirable, worthless–and we’ve been so insensitive to the men’s inner longings? Instead of affirming them in their manhood–we continue to tear them down.

Well, I’ve got news. You, single man, are a conqueror. You are a champion for truth, for righteousness. You are not a captive to your lusts, a bondservant to your base desires. You are a beacon of integrity. You are strong. You are effective.

You’re not a bad provider because you’ve failed to “PWN” yourself a wife. Rather, you’re a good provider. I’ve seen how you paid for someone’s lunch when she didn’t have any cash handy. I’ve seen how you denied yourself to move someone on that hot afternoon after you’d been working all week. I’ve seen how you volunteered for the sound ministry, the children’s church ministry, Royal Rangers, and ushering. You’re a good provider.

You haven’t failed at protecting–I’ve seen you walk that girl to her car when the night was dark. I’ve been the girl you walked to the car. Thanks for not worrying about what people would think. Thanks for not trying to be PC. Thanks for standing firm and protecting–even when the world would leave us helpless. Thanks for being men and lifting the body up in prayer. You may not have a “family” you’re protecting–but you’ve protected us–and I thank you.

It’s not your job to find yourself a wife–that’s God’s job. I’m sorry I ever implied otherwise. I’m sorry I held on to my “feminist ideals” at the expense of your self-worth–thanks for serving me anyway. I’m sorry I tried to manipulate you into doing whatever I wanted, that I acted as if your heart wasn’t worthwhile. I’m sorry that I spoke lies to you about who you are. I’m sorry I stayed silent even when I knew the truth.

Please forgive me for staying silent. I can’t stay silent any longer. Because the truth is that you are a conqueror. You are powerful and effective. You are needed. You’re not less because you’re single. You haven’t failed because you’re single. You don’t need to hurry up and get a move on. You’re doing just fine. Actually, you’re doing more than fine. You’re doing a great job. We need you. Keep up the good work.